VibeOps · Autonomy Lab · VibeCorp Engineering
How much of your engineering org can safely run on agents?
VibeOps maps every engineering workflow, benchmarks model-plus-harness stacks against historical reviewer outcomes, and turns senior judgment into trust agents that certify, approve, or escalate AI-written changes. This isn't a PR reviewer. It's the operating layer for autonomous engineering.
Current
With Trust Packs Demo
65%
79%
+14pts of engineering throughput moves to agent autonomy after activating two Trust Packs.
Reviews → exception-based
37%
Of 1,760 PRs in last 90 days. Senior engineers stop reviewing everything; they handle only unresolved trust decisions.
Cost reduction available
8.4×
On stable workflows. Route Kimi/SLM + Trust Pack on the 62% where the harness proves it's safe; reserve Claude for contract reasoning.
Built for teams already using Claude Code · Cursor · Devin · GitHub Actions · custom agents.
Engineering Autonomy Map
Which workflows can safely run on agents today, which need senior judgment, and what unlocks the next level. Click a row to open the diagnosis.
| Workflow | Autonomy today | With Trust Pack | Main blocker | Risk | Hrs reclaimed/mo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docs & config changes 412 PRs in 90 days · Claude (everywhere) | 92% | 97% +5pts | None — already safe for auto-approval | Low | 28h | |
Additive integration changes 287 PRs in 90 days · Claude | 71% | 86% +15pts | Missing contract proof on external API behavior | Medium | 41h | |
Frontend low-risk UI changes 504 PRs in 90 days · Claude | 64% | 81% +17pts | No visual regression evidence in CI | Medium | 19h | |
Backend API changes 318 PRs in 90 days · Claude | 49% | 68% +19pts | Owner boundary + contract drift | High | 22h | |
Feature-flag rollout changes 96 PRs in 90 days · Claude | 56% | 74% +18pts | Kill-switch path not verified | High | 11h | |
Data migration changes 64 PRs in 90 days · Claude + human | 31% | 48% +17pts | No rollback proof, no shadow-write evidence | Critical | 9h | |
Auth & RBAC changes 41 PRs in 90 days · Claude + AppSec review | 23% | 34% +11pts | Permission boundary ambiguity, missing audit-log evidence | Critical | 6h | |
Core infrastructure changes 38 PRs in 90 days · Claude + staff | 9% | 14% +5pts | Unknown blast radius, no idempotency proof on platform calls | Critical | 4h |
Synthetic replay across 6 VibeCorp repos · 1,760 PRs · heatmap shows weighted autonomy.See 100-PR replay
Why this is the 10× layer
The autonomy number above is the surface. Underneath sit historical replay, a senior-judgment compiler that turns engineering rules into deterministic trust systems, per-workflow model routing that keeps Claude where Claude is needed, and Trust Packs accumulating across deployments. Internal teams can wire one piece — building the system that knows which model with which harness for which workflow is a 6-to-9-month platform-pod effort.